Home
Loan Programs
660 FICO / 5% Down
Condo Cert
580 FICO Score OK
FHA Flips
High Ratio FHA Loans
Self Employed $$$
Audio Application
Mortgage Payment Calculator
RE Agent Corner
Short Sale Recovery
BK Recovery Times
Open House Worksheets
Project Approvals
Forms And Docs
Mortgage Relief Act
Legal Corner
HUD IRS Taskforce
Fraud Watch
How To Webinars
Legal Services
VA Loans
203K Webinar
Google SEO page
Reverse Mort. Webinar
Marine Pics
Loan Mod Info
Bio Page
Commercial Loans
 

Aug.1 2011

Home Owners who receive permanent loan modifications are being viewed as short sellers by Fannie Mae!

Just when it seems sanity is returning to the lending industry….this gets dropped on us.

Homeowners receiving loan modifications for their primary residence (noted on their credit report); are now being treated as short sellers by Fannie Mae…even if the homeowner was never late on their mortgage.

In other words: A responsible homeowner, who made their payments on time and received a loan mod for their primary residence will now have to wait three (at least) years before they can purchase their next home.

The only exception to the rule: If a homeowner received a loan modification on an “investment property/second home” may receive financing on another property (primary residence only) on a case by case basis (underwriter’s discretion) within those three years.

Here are the rules:

Loan modifications:

o Refinance transactions: On previously modified loans…refinancing is not permitted.

o New purchase transactions: When a borrower’s current residence (previous loan) was modified AND the property is being retained as a 2nd home/investment property…financing for another home…will NOT be permitted.

o New purchase transactions: ..When a borrower’s previous loan was modified AND the property is being sold…the borrowers loan application …should be treated with caution and reviewed for delinquencies and short payoffs.

o New purchases of 2nd home or investment properties: When a borrower’s current residence (owner occupied) has been granted a loan modification… financing for the next home will not be NOT permitted.

o Refinances where another property (not the subject property) has a loan modification should be reviewed with caution to ensure that there was no short refinance (treated as a short sale).

For more rules regarding the rules for short sale /foreclosure waiting periods please click here


________________________________________________________________

Banks are foreclosing while homeowners pursue loan modifications

Lenders say 'dual tracking' protects their investment if the homeowner is unable to qualify for new loan terms. But regulators seeking to ban the practice say it lulls some borrowers into thinking they won't have their homes taken away.


April 14, 2011|By Alejandro Lazo, Los Angeles Times

Mortgage lenders call it "dual tracking," but for homeowners struggling to avoid foreclosure, it might go by another name: the double-cross.

Dual tracking refers to a common bank tactic. When a borrower in default seeks a loan modification, the institution often continues to pursue foreclosure at the same time.
 

Lenders contend that dual tracking simply protects their investment if the homeowner is unable to qualify for new loan terms. Mortgage servicers can lose money if they don't foreclose in a timely manner, and repossessions often are complicated and lengthy.

But regulators and consumer advocates say the practice lulls some homeowners into thinking they are no longer at risk of having their homes taken away. Regulators are now aiming to curtail the practice as part of an overhaul of the foreclosure system.

"We don't think that a homeowner who is making a good-faith effort to work through their troubled mortgage should have the roof ripped out from over them while they are negotiating, or trying to negotiate," said Geoff Greenwood, a spokesman for Iowa Atty. Gen. Tom Miller.

On Wednesday, federal banking regulators issued settlements with major banks and home-loan servicers that would, among the many provisions, stop foreclosure once a homeowner is approved for a temporary mortgage modification. In ordering the changes, the regulators said they found "critical weaknesses" in the way the lenders handled foreclosures.

The settlements drew immediate fire from activists who said they did not go far enough, particularly in addressing the two-track foreclosure process. A separate coalition of state attorneys general and federal agencies including the departments of Justice, Treasury and Housing and the Federal Trade Commission is still negotiating details of a foreclosure-system overhaul that could include a near-ban of the practice.

"The dual-tracking issue is of major concern," said Greenwood, whose boss is leading the negotiations for the attorneys general of all 50 states and federal agencies.

The state attorneys general have issued their demands in a detailed, 27-page term sheet. Banks have responded with their own proposals. Negotiations between the two groups continue.

The demands by the attorneys general would prohibit lenders from starting the foreclosure process on a home if a borrower has submitted an application for a loan modification. That is a significant step beyond what the federal regulators have ordered, according to consumer advocates, because often borrowers struggle even to get their loan modification packages reviewed.

"The settlement policy on dual tracking completely misses the point," said Alys Cohen, attorney for the National Consumer Law Center, referring to the deal cut Wednesday by banking regulators. "You have to obtain the loan modification before they stop the foreclosure."

Shirley Robertson of Oxnard has first hand experience with dual tracking.

Robertson learned last summer that her home was scheduled to be sold at a foreclosure auction, so she contacted her lender, JPMorgan Chase & Co. Robertson said she had fallen behind on mortgage payments for her home and a rental house because the economic downturn put her catering business in a tailspin.